Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Tunable T cell immunity towards a protein antigen using polymersomes vs. solid-core nanoparticles
 
research article

Tunable T cell immunity towards a protein antigen using polymersomes vs. solid-core nanoparticles

Stano, Armando
•
Scott, Evan A.
•
Dane, Karen Y.
Show more
2013
Biomaterials

Using poly(propylene sulfide) (PPS) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as components of a nanocarrier platform, we sought to compare immune responses induced by PPS-bl-PEG polymersomes (PSs; watery-core structures, with antigen incorporated within the PSs) and PEG-stabilized PPS nanopartides (NPs; solid-core structures, with antigen conjugated upon the NP surface). We have previously shown strong CD8(+) T cell responses to antigen conjugated to NPs via a disulfide link, and here we investigated the extent to which antigen incorporated within oxidatively-sensitive PSs could induce CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cell responses. C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously immunized with free ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen, or equivalent doses of OVA-loaded into PSs, conjugated onto NPs, or given as a mixture of the two. Free CpG was used as an adjuvant. Antigen-loaded PSs induced enhanced frequencies of antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells in the spleen, lymph nodes and lungs as compared to the NP formulation, whereas antigen-conjugated NPs induced stronger CD8(+) T cell responses. Co-administration of both PSs and NPs elicited T cell immunity characteristic of the two nanocarriers at the same time, i.e. both strong CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses. These results have important implications for particulate-based vaccine design and highlight the potential of using different antigen-delivery systems for the induction of both T helper and cytotoxic T lymphocyte immune responses. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.024
Web of Science ID

WOS:000317700400015

Author(s)
Stano, Armando
Scott, Evan A.
Dane, Karen Y.
Swartz, Melody A.  
Hubbell, Jeffrey A.  
Date Issued

2013

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Published in
Biomaterials
Volume

34

Issue

17

Start page

4339

End page

4346

Subjects

Immunomodulation

•

Nanoparticle

•

Immunostimulation

•

Immune response

•

Flow cytometry

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LMRP  
LLCB  
Available on Infoscience
October 1, 2013
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/95328
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés