Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Conferences, Workshops, Symposiums, and Seminars
  4. Multi-objective optimization in waste plastics - recycling vs thermo-valorization
 
conference paper

Multi-objective optimization in waste plastics - recycling vs thermo-valorization

Amorim Leandro De Castro Amoedo, Rafael  
•
Marchal, Dorian
•
Kantor, Ivan Daniel  
Show more
June 29, 2020
Proceedings of ECOS 2020
33rd International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems - ECOS 2020, Osaka, Japan, June 29 - July 3, 2020

In the past few years, waste management has received increasing attention not only from industry but also from academics. With an increase in plastic content, motivated by China’s ban on its import, waste composition is expected to change in the near future. Plastic is also considered a major pollutant if not handled properly, particularly for soils and oceans. Although recycling of plastics is well established for PET, a whole range remains that needs handling and treatment. Waste plastics are incorporated in a much wider treatment system and are decisive in contributing to waste calorific value. By providing separate collection routes and by increasing recycling, lower amounts are available for combined heat and power in typical thermo-valorization units, which demands the use of conventional fossil fuel alternatives to supply the needs. In this study, a multi- functional economic and environmental optimization is performed, covering the treatment of waste plastics by means of mixed integer linear programming. Multi-objective optimization was conducted to evaluate various designs. Solutions result in a trade-off between costs and emissions, with 8 designs beating current waste management solutions, with proper thermo-valorization challenging recycling processes in environmental impact assessment. Furthermore, costs can be reduced up to 20-fold, while environmental impact showed a potential for up to 20% reduction compared to the BAU scenario. This research allows new ways of considering the benefits and disadvantages of recycling and thermo- valorization, as it pretends to be closer to real systems considering real world trade-offs and decisions, challenging current views and beliefs.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
conference paper
Author(s)
Amorim Leandro De Castro Amoedo, Rafael  
Marchal, Dorian
Kantor, Ivan Daniel  
Margni, Manuele
Maréchal, François  
Date Issued

2020-06-29

Publisher

Osaka, Japan, ECOS 2020 Local Organizing Committee

Published in
Proceedings of ECOS 2020
Total of pages

13

Start page

Osaka, Japan, ECOS 2020 Local Organizing Committee

Subjects

Waste plastics

•

Recycling

•

Incineration

•

Multi-objective optimization

•

Sustainability.

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
SCI-STI-FM  
Event name
33rd International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems - ECOS 2020, Osaka, Japan, June 29 - July 3, 2020
Available on Infoscience
September 7, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/171445
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés