Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Conferences, Workshops, Symposiums, and Seminars
  4. Is the Thorpe and Mason model valid for drifting and blowing snow?
 
conference paper not in proceedings

Is the Thorpe and Mason model valid for drifting and blowing snow?

Sharma, Varun  
•
Comola, Francesco  
•
Lehning, Michael  
April 1, 2018
EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts

Sublimation of drifting and blowing snow has been recognized as an important component of the surface mass budget of polar and alpine regions. The Thorpe and Mason (TM) model is the basis of all existing small and large­scale estimates of drifting snow sublimation. We revisit this model to test its validity for calculating sublimation from snow grains in aeolian transport. Through simple numerical experiments, it is highlighted that the TM model is a steady­state model that reconciles well with the solution of the unsteady mass and heat balance equations of an individual snow grain, albeit after a transient regime. Next, we simulate drifting and blowing using high­resolution large­eddy simulations of the atmospheric surface layer with Lagrangian snow particles, coupled with statistical models of aerodynamic, splash and rebound entrainment of particles from an underlying snow surface. It is found that the residence time of a typical saltating particle is shorter than the period of the transient regime and thus the underlying assumptions of the TM solution are not satisfied. Secondly, the TM solution neglects thermal inertia of the particulate phase, this also results in errors when compared to the explicit heat and mass exchange calculations. In simulations with similar air and surface temperatures, these errors range between 25% for low­wind and low­saturation conditions and 40% for high­wind and high­saturation conditions. With a small temperature difference of 1 K between the air and the snow surface, the errors due to the TM model are already as high as 100% with errors rapidly increasing for larger temperature differences.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
conference paper not in proceedings
Author(s)
Sharma, Varun  
Comola, Francesco  
Lehning, Michael  
Date Issued

2018-04-01

Publisher

Copernicus

Volume

20

Start page

16587

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
CRYOS  
Event nameEvent placeEvent date
EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts

Vienna, Austria

April 4-13, 2018

Available on Infoscience
March 8, 2019
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/155288
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés