Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Hygroscopicity and composition of California CCN during summer 2010
 
research article

Hygroscopicity and composition of California CCN during summer 2010

Moore, R. H.
•
Cerully, K.
•
Bahreini, R.
Show more
2012
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

We present an overview and analysis of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) sampled in California by a NOAA WP-3D aircraft during the 2010 CalNex project. Four distinct geographical regions are characterized, including the Los Angeles basin, the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys, and the eastern Pacific Ocean west of southern California. Median size distributions in the Central Valley were unimodal (Dg ∼ 25nm) with a larger fraction of organic species and smaller fraction of nitrate species in the Sacramento Valley aerosol than in the San Joaquin Valley aerosol. Size distributions in the Los Angeles basin and marine outflow were bimodal (geometric mean diameter, Dg ∼ 30, 90-100nm) with similar organic fractions and some replacement of nitrate with sulfate in the marine outflow. Both fine particle and CCN concentrations were found to decrease rapidly above the planetary boundary layer (∼2 km altitude), with CCN concentrations in the boundary layer ranging from ∼102-104cm-3 STP, while fine particle concentrations (0.004-1 m diameters) ranged from ∼103-10 5 cm-3 STP. The CCN-active number fraction varied between 0-100% in the Los Angeles Basin and Marine Outflow, but was substantially lower (0-40%) in the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys. Values of the hygroscopicity parameter, , inferred from the CCN measurements varied from 0.1-0.25, with the highest values in the marine outflow and the lowest values in the Sacramento Valley. The values agreed well with the predictions based on size-resolved aerosol composition, but were overpredicted by almost twofold when size-averaged composition was used. CCN closure was assessed for simplified compositional and mixing state assumptions, and it was found that assuming the aerosol to be internally mixed overpredicted CCN concentrations by 30-75% for all air mass types except within the Sacramento Valley, where good closure (overprediction < 10%) was achieved by assuming insoluble organics. Assuming an externally-mixed aerosol fraction or incorporating size-resolved composition data improved closure in the other three regions, consistent with the bimodal nature of the aerosol size distribution. © 2012 by the American Geophysical Union.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1029/2011JD017352
Author(s)
Moore, R. H.
Cerully, K.
Bahreini, R.
Brock, C. A.
Middlebrook, A. M.
Nenes, Athanasios  
Date Issued

2012

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume

117

Article Number

D00V12

Subjects

Driers (materials)

•

Geographical regions

•

Landforms

•

Size distribution

•

Aerosol composition

•

Aerosol size distributions

•

Air mass

•

California

•

Cloud condensation nuclei

•

Composition data

•

Eastern pacific Ocean

•

Fine particles

•

Geometric mean

•

Los Angeles Basin

•

Mixing state

•

Nitrate species

•

Organic fractions

•

Organic species

•

Organics

•

Planetary boundary layers

•

San Joaquin Valley

•

Southern California

•

Unimodal

•

Atmospheric aerosols

•

boundary layer

•

chemical composition

•

cloud condensation nucleus

•

fractionation

•

geographical region

•

geometry

•

hygroscopicity

•

inorganic salt

•

measurement method

•

NOAA satellite

•

size distribution

•

Pacific Ocean

•

Pacific Ocean (East)

•

United States

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

OTHER

EPFL units
LAPI  
Available on Infoscience
October 15, 2018
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/148993
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés