Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Evaluation of 30 urban land surface models in the Urban-PLUMBER project: Phase 1 results
 
research article

Evaluation of 30 urban land surface models in the Urban-PLUMBER project: Phase 1 results

Lipson, Mathew J.
•
Grimmond, Sue
•
Best, Martin
Show more
October 4, 2023
Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Meteorological Society

Accurately predicting weather and climate in cities is critical for safeguarding human health and strengthening urban resilience. Multimodel evaluations can lead to model improvements; however, there have been no major intercomparisons of urban-focussed land surface models in over a decade. Here, in Phase 1 of the Urban-PLUMBER project, we evaluate the ability of 30 land surface models to simulate surface energy fluxes critical to atmospheric meteorological and air quality simulations. We establish minimum and upper performance expectations for participating models using simple information-limited models as benchmarks. Compared with the last major model intercomparison at the same site, we find broad improvement in the current cohort's predictions of short-wave radiation, sensible and latent heat fluxes, but little or no improvement in long-wave radiation and momentum fluxes. Models with a simple urban representation (e.g., 'slab' schemes) generally perform well, particularly when combined with sophisticated hydrological/vegetation models. Some mid-complexity models (e.g., 'canyon' schemes) also perform well, indicating efforts to integrate vegetation and hydrology processes have paid dividends. The most complex models that resolve three-dimensional interactions between buildings in general did not perform as well as other categories. However, these models also tended to have the simplest representations of hydrology and vegetation. Models without any urban representation (i.e., vegetation-only land surface models) performed poorly for latent heat fluxes, and reasonably for other energy fluxes at this suburban site. Our analysis identified widespread human errors in initial submissions that substantially affected model performances. Although significant efforts are applied to correct these errors, we conclude that human factors are likely to influence results in this (or any) model intercomparison, particularly where participating scientists have varying experience and first languages. These initial results are for one suburban site, and future phases of Urban-PLUMBER will evaluate models across 20 sites in different urban and regional climate zones.

  • Files
  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1002/qj.4589
Web of Science ID

WOS:001095061700001

Author(s)
Lipson, Mathew J.
Grimmond, Sue
Best, Martin
Abramowitz, Gab
Coutts, Andrew
Tapper, Nigel
Baik, Jong-Jin
Beyers, Meiring
Blunn, Lewis
Boussetta, Souhail
Show more
Date Issued

2023-10-04

Publisher

Wiley

Published in
Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Meteorological Society
Volume

150

Issue

758

Subjects

Physical Sciences

•

Benchmark

•

Energy Balance

•

Intercomparison

•

Model Evaluation

•

Urban Climate

•

Urban Meteorology

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
URBES  
Available on Infoscience
February 19, 2024
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/204124
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés