Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness
 
research article

Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness

Terrier, Alexandre  
•
Buchler, Philippe
•
Farron, Alain
2005
Clinical Biomechanics

BACKGROUND: Although shoulder arthroplasty is an accepted treatment for osteoarthritis, loosening of the glenoid component, which mainly occurs at the bone-cement interface, remains a major concern. Presently, the mechanical effect of the cement mantel thickness on the bone-cement interface is still unclear. METHODS: Finite element analysis of a prosthetic scapula was used to evaluate the effect of cement thickness on stresses and micromotions at the bone-cement interface. The glenoid component was all-polyethylene, keeled and flat back. Cement mantel thickness was gradually increased from 0.5 to 2.0 mm. Two glenohumeral contact forces were applied: concentric and eccentric. Two extreme cases were considered for the bone-cement interface: bonded and debonded. FINDINGS: Within cement, stress increased as cement thickness decreased, reaching the fatigue limit below 1.0 mm. Bone stress was below its ultimate strength and was minimum between 1.0 and 1.5mm. Interface stress was close to the interface strength, and also minimum between 1.0 and 1.5 mm. Both the decentring of the load and the debonding of the interface increased the stress. INTERPRETATION: A cement thinning weakens the cement, but also the bone-cement interface, along the back-keel edges. Conversely, a cement thickening rigidifies the cemented implant, consequently increasing interfacial stresses and micromotions. To avoid both excessive cement fatigue and interface failure, an ideal cement thickness has been identified between 1.0 and 1.5 mm.

  • Files
  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.010
Web of Science ID

WOS:000230523500007

PubMed ID

15961203

Author(s)
Terrier, Alexandre  
Buchler, Philippe
Farron, Alain
Date Issued

2005

Published in
Clinical Biomechanics
Volume

20

Issue

7

Start page

710

End page

717

Subjects

Bone Cements/analysis/*chemistry

•

Cementation/*methods

•

Comparative Study

•

Compressive Strength

•

Computer Simulation

•

Elasticity

•

Equipment Failure Analysis/methods

•

Humans

•

*Joint Prosthesis

•

Materials Testing/methods

•

*Models

•

Biological

•

Models

•

Chemical

•

Prosthesis Implantation/*methods

•

Shoulder Joint/*chemistry/*physiopathology/surgery

•

Stress

•

Mechanical

•

Tensile Strength

•

Therapy

•

Computer-Assisted/*methods

•

Models

Note

Laboratoire de Recherche en Orthopedie, STI-IGBM-LRO, Batiment AA.B, Station 15, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. alexandre.terrier@epfl.ch

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LBO  
Available on Infoscience
July 25, 2006
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/232691
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés