Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Quantitative separation of monomeric U(IV) from UO2 in products of U(VI) reduction
 
research article

Quantitative separation of monomeric U(IV) from UO2 in products of U(VI) reduction

Alessi, Daniel S.  
•
Uster, Benjamin  
•
Veeramani, Harish  
Show more
2012
Environmental Science & Technology

The reduction of soluble hexavalent uranium to tetravalent uranium can be catalyzed by bacteria and minerals. The end-product of this reduction is often the mineral uraninite, which was long assumed to be the only product of U(VI) reduction. However, recent studies report the formation of other species including an adsorbed U(IV) species, operationally referred to as monomeric U(IV). The discovery of monomeric U(IV) is important because the species is likely to be more labile and more susceptible to reoxidation than uraninite. Because there is,a need to distinguish between these two U(IV) species, we propose here a wet chemical method of differentiating monomeric U(IV) from uraninite in environmental samples. To calibrate the method, U(IV) was extracted from known mixtures of uraninite and monomeric U(IV) and tested using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Monomeric U(IV) was efficiently removed from biomass and Fe(II)-bearing phases by bicarbonate extraction, without affecting uraninite stability. After confirming that the method effectively separates monomeric U(IV) and uraninite, it is further evaluated for a system containing those reduced U species and adsorbed U(VI). The method provides a rapid complement, and in some cases alternative, to XAS analyses for quantifying monomeric U(IV), uraninite, and adsorbed U(VI) species in environmental samples.

  • Files
  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1021/es204123z
Web of Science ID

WOS:000304783000067

Author(s)
Alessi, Daniel S.  
Uster, Benjamin  
Veeramani, Harish  
Suvorova Buffat, Elena  
Lezama-Pacheco, Juan S.
Stubbs, Joanne E.
Bargar, John R.
Bernier-Latmani, Rizlan  
Date Issued

2012

Published in
Environmental Science & Technology
Volume

46

Issue

11

Start page

6150

End page

6157

Subjects

Contaminated Soils

•

Uranium

•

Immobilization

•

Spectroscopy

•

Hydrolysis

•

Extraction

•

Interface

•

Ifeffit

•

Aquifer

•

Model

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
EML  
Available on Infoscience
May 8, 2012
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/80146
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés