Limiting Regimes of a Three-Dimensional Buoyant Hydraulic Fracture Emerging from a Point Source
Buoyant hydraulic fractures occur in nature as magmatic dikes and sills. In industrial applications like well stimulation, the emergence of buoyant fractures is undesirable and often limited by the injected volume and/or variation of in-situ stress. This class of tensile fractures is governed by a buoyancy force resulting from the density contrast between the surrounding solid and the fracturing fluid. We focus here on fluid releases from a point source in an impermeable elastic media with homogeneous rock and fluid properties. The resulting buoyant force is thus constant. We combine scaling arguments and planar 3D hydraulic fracture growth simulations [1] to fully understand the emergence as well as the different propagation regimes of buoyant fractures. For a continuous release, a family of solutions dependent on a dimensionless-viscosity $\mathcal{M}{\hat{k}}$ exists. In the limit of large toughness ($\mathcal{M}{\hat{k}} \ll 1$), we retrieve a finger-like shape [2]. The stable breadth of the tail is generally akin to the PKN approximation presented in [2]. The limit of a viscosity-dominated buoyant fracture ($\mathcal{M}{\hat{k}} \gg 1$) has no stabilized breadth and exhibits a teardrop shape. For the case of a finite fluid volume release, a dimensionless buoyancy $\mathcal{B}{\bar{k}}$ controls if a buoyant fracture emerges ($\mathcal{B}{\bar{k}} \geq 1$) or stops and remains at depth ($\mathcal{B}{\bar{k}} <1$). For a finite release, a single large-time solution corresponding to the solution of [2] exists. Detailed characterization of the fracture evolution requires separation between the cases where the buoyant transition occurs during or after the release (see attached Fig. 1). For natural configurations, the emerging buoyant fractures are typically viscosity-dominated, which may explain the reported discrepancy between field and laboratory measurements of rock fracture toughness. Representative values of industrial single-entry hydraulic fracturing treatments lead to buoyant fractures under homogeneous conditions, which indicate the critical importance of stress and material heterogeneities in the containment of buoyant fractures at depth. [1] Haseeb Zia and Brice Lecampion. Pyfrac: A planar 3d hydraulic fracture simulator. Computer Physics Communications, page 107368, 2020. [2] L.N. Germanovich, D. I. Garagash, Murdoch, L., and Robinowitz M. Gravity-driven hydraulic fractures. In AGU Fall meeting, 2014.
AGU_Abstract_Final.pdf
n/a
openaccess
CC BY-NC-ND
5.7 MB
Adobe PDF
5f8f9adad4c4839ea832b16eea781ec2
MoeriLecampion_2021_AGUFallMeeting_Regimes3DBuoyantHF.pdf
n/a
openaccess
CC BY-NC
5.59 MB
Adobe PDF
ea63c3cbbaf27ea95b4e8440b2e84752