Most logic synthesis algorithms work on graph representations of logic functions with nodes associated with arbitrary logic expressions or simple logic functions and iteratively optimize such graphs. While recent multilevel logic synthesis efforts focused primarily on graphs with 2-input nodes such as AND and OR gates, the recently proposed paradigm of Majority-Inverter Graphs (MIGs) instead uses the 3-input Majority gate as the node function. As this technique proved to be a success, it is natural to ask: are there other 3-input gates better suited for logic synthesis? Motivated by this question, we investigate the relative advantages of 3-input gates as constituents of logic networks. We consider representative gates from each of the ten nondegenerate 3-input NPN classes and study how powerful they are at representing Boolean functions. Using SAT-based exact synthesis, we evaluate each 3-input gate using the minimum number of such gates (together with inverters) needed to synthesize all 4-input Boolean functions and a subset of frequent 5-input and 6-input Boolean functions. We show that the logic gate Dot(x,y, z) := x circle plus (z boolean OR xy) outperforms the rest in terms of expressive power. We further confirm this observation by showing that Dot-Inverter Graph representations are more than 14% smaller as compared to MIG representations of EPFL benchmarks.