Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Effect of tool-use observation on metric body representation and peripersonal space
 
research article

Effect of tool-use observation on metric body representation and peripersonal space

Galigani, M.
•
Castellani, N.
•
Donno, B.
Show more
November 1, 2020
Neuropsychologia

In everyday life, we constantly act and interact with objects and with others' people through our body. To properly perform actions, the representations of the dimension of body-parts (metric body representation, BR) and of the space surrounding the body (peripersonal space, PPS) need to be constantly updated. Previous evidence has shown that BR and PPS representation are highly flexible, being modulated by sensorimotor experiences, such as the active use of tools to reach objects in the far space. In this study, we investigate whether the observation of another person using a tool to interact with objects located in the far space is sufficient to influence the plasticity of BR and PPS representation in a similar way to active tool-use. With this aim, two groups of young healthy participants were asked to perform 20 min trainings based on the active use of a tool to retrieve far cubes (active tool-use) and on the first-person observation of an experimenter doing the same tool-use training (observational tool-use). Behavioural tasks adapted from literature were used to evaluate the effects of the active and observational tool-use on BR (body-landmarks localization task-group 1), and PPS (audio-tactile interaction task - group 2). Results show that after active tool-use, participants perceived the length of their arm as longer than at baseline, while no significant differences appear after observation. Similarly, significant modifications in PPS representation, with comparable multisensory facilitation on tactile responses due to near and far sounds, were seen only after active tool-use, while this did not occur after observation. Together these results suggest that a mere observational training could not be sufficient to significantly modulate BR or PPS. The dissociation found in the active and observational tool-use points out differences between action execution and action observation, by suggesting a fundamental role of the motor planning, the motor intention, and the related sensorimotor feedback in driving BR and PPS plasticity.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107622
Web of Science ID

WOS:000595875700006

Author(s)
Galigani, M.
Castellani, N.
Donno, B.
Franza, M.  
Zuber, C.
Allet, L.
Garbarini, F.
Bassolino, M.  
Date Issued

2020-11-01

Published in
Neuropsychologia
Volume

148

Article Number

107622

Subjects

Behavioral Sciences

•

Neurosciences

•

Psychology, Experimental

•

Neurosciences & Neurology

•

Psychology

•

body representation

•

peripersonal space

•

tool-use

•

action observation

•

motor intention

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LNCO  
Available on Infoscience
January 7, 2021
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/174482
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés