Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase
 
review article

Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase

Laurent, Alexis
•
Weidema, Bo P.
•
Bare, Jane
Show more
May 20, 2020
Journal Of Industrial Ecology

Life cycle interpretation is the fourth and last phase of life cycle assessment (LCA). Being a "pivot" phase linking all other phases and the conclusions and recommendations from an LCA study, it represents a challenging task for practitioners, who miss harmonized guidelines that are sufficiently complete, detailed, and practical to conduct its different steps effectively. Here, we aim to bridge this gap. We review available literature describing the life cycle interpretation phase, including standards, LCA books, technical reports, and relevant scientific literature. On this basis, we evaluate and clarify the definition and purposes of the interpretation phase and propose an array of methods supporting its conduct in LCA practice. The five steps of interpretation defined in ISO 14040-44 are proposed to be reorganized around a framework that offers a more pragmatic approach to interpretation. It orders the steps as follows: (i) completeness check, (ii) consistency check, (iii) sensitivity check, (iv) identification of significant issues, and (v) conclusions, limitations, and recommendations. We provide toolboxes, consisting of methods and procedures supporting the analyses, computations, points to evaluate or check, and reflective processes for each of these steps. All methods are succinctly discussed with relevant referencing for further details of their applications. This proposed framework, substantiated with the large variety of methods, is envisioned to help LCA practitioners increase the relevance of their interpretation and the soundness of their conclusions and recommendations. It is a first step toward a more comprehensive and harmonized LCA practice to improve the reliability and credibility of LCA studies.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1111/jiec.13012
Web of Science ID

WOS:000533994600001

Author(s)
Laurent, Alexis
Weidema, Bo P.
Bare, Jane
Liao, Xun  
de Souza, Danielle Maia
Pizzol, Massimo
Sala, Serenella
Schreiber, Hanna
Thonemann, Nils
Verones, Francesca
Date Issued

2020-05-20

Publisher

WILEY

Published in
Journal Of Industrial Ecology
Volume

24

Issue

5

Start page

986

End page

1003

Subjects

Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

•

Engineering, Environmental

•

Environmental Sciences

•

Science & Technology - Other Topics

•

Engineering

•

Environmental Sciences & Ecology

•

completeness and consistency checks

•

decision-making

•

iso

•

life cycle assessment (lca)

•

result evaluation

•

uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

•

sensitivity-analysis

•

end-points

•

uncertainty

•

midpoints

•

framework

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
SCI-STI-FM  
Available on Infoscience
May 31, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/169025
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés