Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Critical review of standards for indoor thermal environment and air quality
 
review article

Critical review of standards for indoor thermal environment and air quality

Khovalyg, Dolaana  
•
Kazanci, Ongun B.
•
Halvorsen, Hanne
Show more
April 15, 2020
Energy And Buildings

Quality of the indoor environment has become an important parameter to account for in new and existing buildings due to the increasing number of people spending most of their time indoors. Generally, the design and evaluation of indoor environments in buildings rely on appropriate guidelines and recommendations. National and international IEQ standards specify indoor environmental conditions considered acceptable to most occupants. This publication reviews and critically compares the requirements for indoor thermal environment and ventilation for acceptable air quality across international standards such as ISO, EN and ASHRAE and national standards of China, India, Singapore, and Australia. The critical analysis of IEQ standards demonstrates that regional differences and diversity factors due to factors such as climate, building typology, demographics, and culture might not be appropriately addressed both in national and international standards, limiting the feasibility of universal indoor environmental criteria. In addition to that, most of the standards provide recommendations for various categories of thermal comfort and air quality by focusing on the perception of IEQ by occupants rather than productivity and wellness as quantitative criteria. The review shows that thermal comfort and air quality parameters are treated separately and without an integrated assessment of various environmental quality-related dimensions. Therefore, there is a need for a method to combine various indoor environmental factors into a combined indicator. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109819
Web of Science ID

WOS:000520407700003

Author(s)
Khovalyg, Dolaana  
Kazanci, Ongun B.
Halvorsen, Hanne
Gundlach, Ida
Bahnfleth, William P.
Toftum, Jorn
Olesen, Bjarne W.
Date Issued

2020-04-15

Published in
Energy And Buildings
Volume

213

Article Number

109819

Subjects

Construction & Building Technology

•

Energy & Fuels

•

Engineering, Civil

•

Engineering

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
ICE  
Available on Infoscience
April 2, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/167780
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés