Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy for cavernous sinus meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
 
review article

Radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy for cavernous sinus meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Leroy, Henri-Arthur
•
Tuleasca, Constantin
•
Reyns, Nicolas
Show more
December 1, 2018
Acta Neurochirurgica

IntroductionRadiosurgery (RS) and fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) are part of the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. We propose a systematic review of the local tumor control and clinical outcomes after monofractionated radiosurgical treatment, including gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and linear accelerator (Linac RS), or fractionated radiotherapy.Materials and MethodsThe current review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and Medline based on the following mesh terms, used alone or in diverse combinations, in both title and abstract: cavernous sinus, meningioma, radiosurgery, gamma knife, linac, cyberknife, and radiotherapy. We screened 425 studies. We selected 36 studies, matching all selection criteria: 24 for GK, 5 for Linac, and 7 for FRT.ResultsWere included 2817 patients (GKRS, n=2047, LinacRS, n=350, FRT, n=420). Half of patients benefited from upfront RS or FRT; the other half benefited from adjuvant RS or FRT (combined approach or tumor recurrence). The mean gross target volume (GTV) was smaller for RS as compared to FRT (p=0.07). The median marginal doses were 13.9Gy (range, 11 to 28) for GKRS and 14Gy (range, 12.8 to 17.7) for LinacRS. For FRT, patients received a mean dose of 51.2Gy (25.5 fractions, 1.85Gy each). The mean overall follow-up values were 48months (range, 15 to 89) for GKRS, 69months (range, 46 to 87) for Linac, and 59.5months (range, 33 to 83) for FRT. PFS at 5years for GKRS, LinacRS, and FRT were respectively 93.6%, 95.6%, and 97.4% (p=0.32, the Kruskal-Wallis). Monofractionated treatments (GKRS and LinacRS) induced more tumor volume regression than FRT (p=0.001). Tumor recurrence or progression ranged between 3 and 5.8%, without statistically significant differences between modalities (p>0.05). Trigeminal symptoms improved in approximately 54%, and III-IV-VI cranial nerves (CN) palsies improved in approximately 45%. After GKRS, visual acuity improved in 21% (not enough data available for other modalities). De novo deficits occurred in 5 to 7.5%. Adverse radiation effects appeared in 4.6 to 9.3% (all techniques pooled).ConclusionRS achieved a twice-higher rate of tumor volume regression than FRT. GKRS series reported an improvement in visual acuity in 21% of the cases. GKRS, Linac, and FRT provided similar clinical post therapeutic outcomes for the trigeminal and oculomotor CN.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1007/s00701-018-3711-9
Web of Science ID

WOS:000450984500013

Author(s)
Leroy, Henri-Arthur
Tuleasca, Constantin
Reyns, Nicolas
Levivier, Marc
Date Issued

2018-12-01

Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica
Volume

160

Issue

12

Start page

2367

End page

2378

Subjects

Clinical Neurology

•

Surgery

•

Neurosciences & Neurology

•

Surgery

•

cavernous sinus meningioma

•

radiosurgery

•

radiotherapy

•

gamma knife

•

gamma-knife radiosurgery

•

long-term outcomes

•

hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

•

follow-up

•

radiation-therapy

•

tumor-control

•

local-control

•

surgery

•

management

•

base

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
IEL  
Available on Infoscience
December 13, 2018
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/152680
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés