Assessing Physical Activity in Inpatient Rehabilitation - Sensor-based Validation of the PAIR

Increased physical activity is positively associated with better health in community-dwelling older persons. It is unclear whether physical activity also influences success of inpatient rehabilitation. For the assessment of physical activity in inpatient rehabilitation the Physical Activity in Inpatient Rehabilitation Assessment (PAIR), a short questionnaire based on five questions, was developed and preliminary validated. In this study, the PAIR was validated against a sensor-based physical activity measurement. Seventy functionally impaired and cognitively mostly intact patients of a German geriatric inpatient rehabilitation clinic who had undergone hip surgery (n=62 women, median age=83 years) participated. Physical activity was measured using the PAIR and a sensor-based activity monitor (Physilog (R); BioAGM, CH). Assessments were conducted at admission (T1) and 2 weeks later (T2) during the rehabilitation process. To assess concurrent and predictive validity, Spearman correlations and linear regression models were calculated using sensor-based walking activity and uptime activity (walking and standing time) as dependent variables. Criterion-related concurrent validity using physical activity sensors was weak to moderate. Correlations were slightly higher at T2 (r=0.45-0.53) than at T1 (r=0.44-0.46). The objectively measured variance of physical activity, explained by the PAIR, ranged from 25 to 43%. PAIR activity scores and sensor-based walking or total activity increased in a dose-dependent manner, confirming the scoring system of the PAIR. The application time was usually less than 2 min. The validity of the PAIR is weak to moderate when compared to a sensor-based activity monitor and comparable to existing physical activity assessments for community-dwelling older adults.

Published in:
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 11, 133-139
Heidelberg, Springer Heidelberg

 Record created 2014-01-10, last modified 2020-07-29

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)