Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Distribution of arm velocity and frequency of arm usage during daily activity: objective outcome evaluation after shoulder surgery
 
research article

Distribution of arm velocity and frequency of arm usage during daily activity: objective outcome evaluation after shoulder surgery

Duc, Cyntia  
•
Farron, Alain  
•
Pichonnaz, Claude  
Show more
2013
Gait and Posture

In clinical settings, functional evaluation of shoulder movement is primarily based on what the patient thinks he/she is able to do rather than what he/she is actually performing. We proposed a new approach for shoulder assessment based on inertial sensors to monitor arm movement in the daily routine. The detection of movement of the humerus relative to the trunk was first validated in a laboratory setting (sensitivity > 95%, specificity > 97%). Then, 41 control subjects and 21 patients suffering from a rotator cuff tear were evaluated (before and after surgery) using clinical questionnaires and a one-day measurement of arm movement. The quantity of movement was estimated with the movement frequency and its symmetry index (SIFr). The quality of movement was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance (KS) between the cumulative distribution of the arm velocity for controls and the same distribution for each patient. SIFr presented differences between patients and controls at 3 month follow-up (p < 0.05) while KS showed differences also after 6 months (p < 0.01). SIFr illustrated a change in dominance due to the disorder whereas KS, which appeared independent of the dominance and occupation, showed a change in movement velocity. Both parameters were correlated to clinical scores (R-2 reaching 0.5). This approach provides clinicians with new objective parameters for evaluating the functional ability of the shoulder in daily conditions, which could be useful for outcome assessment after surgery. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.021
Web of Science ID

WOS:000321499400015

Author(s)
Duc, Cyntia  
Farron, Alain  
Pichonnaz, Claude  
Jolles-Haeberli, Brigitte  
Bassin, Jean Philippe
Aminian, Kamiar  
Date Issued

2013

Publisher

Elsevier

Published in
Gait and Posture
Volume

38

Issue

2

Start page

247

End page

252

Subjects

Upper limb usage

•

Daily activity

•

Outcome evaluation

•

Ambulatory systems

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LMAM  
Available on Infoscience
December 1, 2012
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/87131
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés