Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Time-dependent biodistribution of tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A in the hamster model: comparative fluorescence microscopy study
 
research article

Time-dependent biodistribution of tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A in the hamster model: comparative fluorescence microscopy study

Andrejevic Blant, S.
•
Ballini, J. P.
•
van den Bergh, H.  
Show more
2000
Photochemistry and photobiology

The pharmacokinetics of the photosensitizer used play a key role in the understanding of the mechanism of photodynamic therapy-induced damage. Fluorescence microscopy was used to compare time-dependent biodistribution of tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA) in different hamster tissues, including an early, chemically induced, squamous cell carcinoma. Following injection of 0.5 mg/kg body weight of mTHPC and 2.0 mg/kg BPD-MA, groups of three animals were sacrificed at different time points and a series of fluorescence micrographs from different excised organs were analyzed. The highest fluorescence intensities of mTHPC were observed at 96 h for squamous epithelia and skin and at 48 h for smooth muscle. There is no real peak of BPD-MA fluorescence between 30 min and 3 h in the basal epithelial layers, fibroconnective tissue, muscles or blood vessels. At 4 h after injection, the fluorescence level of BPD-MA decreased and at 24 h it had returned to background level in all observed tissues. The significantly faster clearance of BPD-MA is the principal advantage as compared to mTHPC. However, similar localization patterns in different tissues with essentially vascular affinity represent a possible disadvantage for treating early malignancies with BPD-MA as compared to mTHPC, which is mainly localized in various epithelia. For both photosensitizers no significant selectivity between early squamous cell carcinoma and healthy mucosae is seen. Pharmacokinetic studies of different photosensitizers in an appropriate animal model are essential for selecting new-generation photosensitizers with the most favorable localization for photodynamic therapy of early malignancies in hollow organs.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1562/0031-8655(2000)0710333TDBOTM2.0.CO2
Author(s)
Andrejevic Blant, S.
Ballini, J. P.
van den Bergh, H.  
Fontolliet, C.
Wagnières, G.  
Monnier, P.
Date Issued

2000

Published in
Photochemistry and photobiology
Volume

71

Issue

3

Start page

333

End page

40

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
GR-VDB  
LPAS  
GPM  
Available on Infoscience
February 1, 2011
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/63788
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés