Temporal patterning of 'unlearnable' stimuli types does not always enable learning

Presenting two or more stimulus types randomly interleaved, so-called roving stimuli, disrupts perceptual learning in many paradigms. It was recently reported that learning with disrupting stimuli types is possible when stimuli are presented in an alternating sequence, ie stimulus from type A, then type B, then type A, etc. In our experiment we used used bisection stimuli, but found the opposite pattern of results. Presentation of bisection stimuli in a sequence disrupted perceptual learning. We tried to explain these seemingly contradictory results by conducting a meta-analysis. Participants who initially performed the task at a low level, ie 'bad performers', were able to learn, whereas the 'good performers' did not (good performers were still outside the ceiling range). Therefore, interleaving stimuli may not abolish perceptual learning, they may just make it more difficult and more prone to interact with other factors, such as the initial performance level.

Published in:
Perception, 38, ECVP Supplement, 99
Presented at:
32nd European Conference on Visual Perception, Regensburg, Germany, August 24-29, 2009

 Record created 2010-10-15, last modified 2018-09-13

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)