Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Prion versus Doppel Protein Misfolding: New Insights from Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations
 
research article

Prion versus Doppel Protein Misfolding: New Insights from Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Baillod, Pascal
•
Garrec, Julian  
•
Tavernelli, Ivano  
Show more
2013
Biochemistry

The doppel (Dpl) and prion (PrP) proteins share a very similar fold (three helices and two short beta-strands), while they differ significantly in sequence (only 25% homologous) and in disease-related beta-rich conformations that occur for PrP only. In a previous study [Baillod, P., et al. (2012) Biochemistry 51, 9891-9899], we investigated the misfolding and rare, beta-rich folds of monomeric PrP with replica-exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations. In the work presented here, we perform analogous simulations for Dpl with the aim of comparing the two systems and characterizing possible specificities of PrP for misfolding and amyloidogenesis. Our extensive simulations, which allow us to overcome high energy barriers via the REMD approach, sample several beta-rich folds, some of which are stable at room temperature, for both proteins. Per residue secondary structure propensities reveal that novel beta-sheets of Dpl and PrP are formed by amino acids belonging to the helices that are the least stable in the respective native structure, H1 for Dpl and H2 and H3 for PrP, in agreement with experimental data. Using a specific clustering method that allows discrimination against different beta-strand arrangements, seven beta-rich folds could be characterized for PrP and five for Dpl, which are clearly distinct and share only one single similar fold. A major difference between the two proteins is found in the free energy barriers leading to misfolded structures: they are approximately 3 times higher for Dpl than for PrP. This suggests that the difference in amyloidogenic behavior between PrP and Dpl might be due to kinetic reasons.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1021/bi400884e
Web of Science ID

WOS:000327753200013

Author(s)
Baillod, Pascal
Garrec, Julian  
Tavernelli, Ivano  
Rothlisberger, Ursula  
Date Issued

2013

Publisher

American Chemical Society

Published in
Biochemistry
Volume

52

Issue

47

Start page

8518

End page

8526

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LCBC  
Available on Infoscience
January 9, 2014
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/99279
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés