Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Do energy performance certificates allow reliable predictions of actual energy consumption and savings? Learning from the Swiss national database
 
research article

Do energy performance certificates allow reliable predictions of actual energy consumption and savings? Learning from the Swiss national database

Cozza, Stefano  
•
Chambers, Jonathan
•
Deb, Chirag
Show more
October 1, 2020
Energy And Buildings

The thermal performance gap in buildings is defined as the difference between the theoretical and the actual energy consumption for heating, and is known to undermine energy retrofit strategies and policies. This study examines the performance gap in retrofitted buildings using the Swiss Cantonal Energy Certificate for Buildings (CECB) database, using a sample of 1172 buildings for which both theoretical and actual metered consumption were known. We found an average negative performance gap of - 23% for pre-retrofit buildings (actual consumption smaller than calculated) and instead a good approximation of actual consumption with theoretical consumption after retrofitting (a positive gap of 2%). A regression analysis on the energy performance certificate input parameters characterizing the building led to the conclusion that these are poor predictors of actual consumption compared to the theoretical calculation: parameters such as the energy label and the thermal proprieties of the envelope (U values) have minor explanatory power for the actual consumption despite explaining a high degree of change in the theoretical consumption. Analysis of the indicator Energy Savings Deficit (ESD) shows an overestimation (of 37%) of the achievable savings on the basis of the theoretical consumption, whereas the prediction of savings using measured consumption before retrofit resulted in a good agreement with the actual savings (3.6% overestimation). This implies that energy savings can be estimated rather accurately by comparing the actual current consumption with the expected theoretical consumption defined by the certificate after retrofit. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110235
Web of Science ID

WOS:000571218200017

Author(s)
Cozza, Stefano  
Chambers, Jonathan
Deb, Chirag
Scartezzini, Jean-Louis  
Schlueter, Arno
Patel, Martin K.
Date Issued

2020-10-01

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA

Published in
Energy And Buildings
Volume

224

Article Number

110235

Subjects

Construction & Building Technology

•

Energy & Fuels

•

Engineering, Civil

•

Engineering

•

building retrofit

•

actual energy consumption

•

performance gap

•

energy savings deficit

•

occupant behavior

•

gap

•

dwellings

•

uncertainty

•

renovation

•

buildings

•

framework

•

fit

•

uk

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
BUILD-O  
LESO-PB  
Available on Infoscience
October 7, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/172266
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés