Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Neural signal recording and processing in somatic neuroprosthetic applications. A review
 
review article

Neural signal recording and processing in somatic neuroprosthetic applications. A review

Raspopovic, Stanisa
•
Cimolato, Andrea
•
Panarese, Alessandro
Show more
May 1, 2020
Journal Of Neuroscience Methods

Neurointerfaces have acquired major relevance as both rehabilitative and therapeutic tools for patients with spinal cord injury, limb amputations and other neural disorders. Bidirectional neural interfaces are a key component for the functional control of neuroprosthetic devices. The two main neuroprosthetic applications of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are: the refined control of artificial prostheses with sensory neural feedback, and functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems attempting to generate motor or visceral responses in paralyzed organs. The results obtained in experimental and clinical studies with both, extraneural and intraneural electrodes are very promising in terms of the achieved functionality for the neural stimulation mode. However, the results of neural recordings with peripheral nerve interfaces are more limited. In this paper we review the different existing approaches for PNS signals recording, denoising, processing and classification, enabling their use for bidirectional interfaces. PNS recordings can provide three types of signals: i) population activity signals recorded by using extraneural electrodes placed on the outer surface of the nerve, which carry information about cumulative nerve activity; ii) spike activity signals recorded with intraneural electrodes placed inside the nerve, which carry information about the electrical activity of a set of individual nerve fibers; and iii) hybrid signals, which contain both spiking and cumulative signals. Finally, we also point out some of the main limitations, which are hampering clinical translation of neural decoding, and indicate possible solutions for improvement.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108653
Web of Science ID

WOS:000526108300006

Author(s)
Raspopovic, Stanisa
Cimolato, Andrea
Panarese, Alessandro
Vallone, Fabio
del Valle, Jaume
Micera, Silvestro  
Navarro, Xavier
Date Issued

2020-05-01

Publisher

ELSEVIER

Published in
Journal Of Neuroscience Methods
Volume

337

Article Number

108653

Subjects

Biochemical Research Methods

•

Neurosciences

•

Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

•

Neurosciences & Neurology

•

peripheral nerve

•

neural interfaces

•

signal processing

•

neuroprosthesis

•

neural decoding

•

brain-computer interfaces

•

extracellular spike detection

•

multichannel electrode time

•

nerve action-potentials

•

upper-limb prostheses

•

to-noise ratio

•

of-the-art

•

median nerve

•

electroneurographic signals

•

peripheral-nerves

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
TNE  
Available on Infoscience
April 30, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/168495
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés