Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Inequality in energy and climate policies: Assessing distributional impact consideration in UK policy appraisal
 
research article

Inequality in energy and climate policies: Assessing distributional impact consideration in UK policy appraisal

Zimmermann, Michel  
•
Pye, Steve
October 4, 2018
Energy Policy

The decarbonisation of the UK economy requires a myriad of policies that inherently produce winners and loser across society. This study investigates how such distributional impacts are considered in the appraisal process for UK energy and climate policies. Using a scorecard developed to capture the guidance on policy appraisal and distributional analysis, 79 impact assessments were evaluated. The majority of these impact assessments either did not or only partially considered the impacts of policies on vulnerable groups in society, with only eight assessments containing more detailed distributional analysis. Moreover, a bias seems to exist as to which areas of energy and climate policy provide well-founded analysis and which do not. With further insights gained from interviews with relevant actors, this research concludes that political motivation, analytical difficulties and a lack of awareness of the prevalence and importance of distributional impacts are at the root of this insufficient consideration. Possible alterations to the current IA framework are presented, which aim to more firmly embed the distributional impact assessment in the appraisal process.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.062
Author(s)
Zimmermann, Michel  
Pye, Steve
Date Issued

2018-10-04

Published in
Energy Policy
Volume

123

Start page

594

End page

601

Subjects

• UK energy and climate policy appraisal contains limited distributional analysis.

•

• Two out of three impact assessments did not consider distributional implications.

•

• Only 10% of the analysed impact assessments were of a satisfactory quality.

•

• Distributional impact analysis varied largely between different policy areas.

•

• The appraisal process needs changes for better recognition of distributional impacts.

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LEURE  
Available on Infoscience
October 4, 2018
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/148651
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés