Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation to the ipsilesional motor cortex in subacute stroke (NETS): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
 
research article

Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation to the ipsilesional motor cortex in subacute stroke (NETS): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Gerloff, Christian
•
Heise, Kirstin-Friederike
•
Hummel, Friedhelm Christoph  
Show more
March 1, 2024
Lancet Regional Health-Europe

Background Each year, five million people are left disabled after stroke. Upper -extremity (UE) dysfunction is a leading problem. Neuroplasticity can be enhanced by non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) but evidence from large, randomized multicenter trials is lacking. We aimed at demonstrating efficacy of NIBS to enhance motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Methods We randomly assigned patients to receive anodal transcranial direct current (tDCS, 1 mA, 20 min) or placebo stimulation ('control') over the primary motor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere in addition to standardized rehabilitative training over ten days in the subacute phase after stroke. The original study was planned to enrol 250 but, following a blinded interim analysis, ended with 123 participants. The primary outcome parameter was UE impairment, measured by UE-Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA), one to seven days after the end of the treatment intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00909714). Findings From 2009 to 2019,123 patients were included, with 119 entering intention -to -treat analysis (ITT). The control group (N = 61) improved 8.9 (SD 7.7) UEFMA points, the tDCS group (N = 58) improved 9.0 (8.8) points. ITT was neutral with respect to the primary efficacy endpoint (p = 0.820). We found no difference in UEFMA change between active tDCS and control. The safety profile of tDCS was favorable. In particular, there were no seizures. Interpretation In patients with ischemic stroke, anodal tDCS applied to the motor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere over 10 days in the subacute phase was safe but did not improve the recovery of upper extremity function compared with placebo stimulation. 2024;38:

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100844
Web of Science ID

WOS:001205885900001

Author(s)
Gerloff, Christian
Heise, Kirstin-Friederike
Hummel, Friedhelm Christoph  
Schulz, Robert
Wolf, Silke
Zapf, Antonia
Wegscheider, Karl
Corporate authors
NETS Trial Collaboration Grp
Date Issued

2024-03-01

Publisher

Elsevier

Published in
Lancet Regional Health-Europe
Volume

38

Article Number

100844

Subjects

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

•

Stroke

•

Recovery

•

Brain Stimulation

•

Neuroplasticity

•

Neurorehabilitation

•

Clinical Trial

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
UPHUMMEL  
FunderGrant Number

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

GE 844/4-1

Available on Infoscience
May 1, 2024
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/207734
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés