Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Automated Classification of Brain Tumor Type in Whole-Slide Digital Pathology Images Using Local Representative Tiles
 
research article

Automated Classification of Brain Tumor Type in Whole-Slide Digital Pathology Images Using Local Representative Tiles

Barker, J.
•
Hoogi, A.
•
Depeursinge, A.
Show more
2016
Medical Image Analysis

Computerized analysis of digital pathology images offers the potential of improving clinical care (e.g. automated diagnosis) and catalyzing research (e.g. discovering disease subtypes). There are two key challenges thwarting computerized analysis of digital pathology images: first, whole slide pathology images are massive, making computerized analysis inefficient, and second, diverse tissue regions in whole slide images that are not directly relevant to the disease may mislead computerized diagnosis algorithms. We propose a method to overcome both of these challenges that utilizes a coarse-to-fine analysis of the localized characteristics in pathology images. An initial surveying stage analyzes the diversity of coarse regions in the whole slide image. This includes extraction of spatially localized features of shape, color and texture from tiled regions covering the slide. Dimensionality reduction of the features assesses the image diversity in the tiled regions and clustering creates representative groups. A second stage provides a detailed analysis of a single representative tile from each group. An Elastic Net classifier produces a diagnostic decision value for each representative tile. A weighted voting scheme aggregates the decision values from these tiles to obtain a diagnosis at the whole slide level. We evaluated our method by automatically classifying 302 brain cancer cases into two possible diagnoses (glioblastoma multiforme (N = 182) versus lower grade glioma (N = 120)) with an accuracy of 93.1 % (p << 0.001). We also evaluated our method in the dataset provided for the 2014 MICCAI Pathology Classification Challenge, in which our method, trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation, produced a classification accuracy of 100% (p << 0.001). Our method showed high stability and robustness to parameter variation, with accuracy varying between 95.5% and 100% when evaluated for a wide range of parameters. Our approach may be useful to automatically differentiate between the two cancer subtypes.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002
Author(s)
Barker, J.
Hoogi, A.
Depeursinge, A.
Rubin, D.L.
Date Issued

2016

Publisher

Elsevier

Published in
Medical Image Analysis
Volume

30

Start page

60

End page

71

URL

URL

http://bigwww.epfl.ch/publications/barker1601.html

URL

http://bigwww.epfl.ch/publications/barker1601.pdf

URL

http://bigwww.epfl.ch/publications/barker1601.ps
Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LIB  
Available on Infoscience
April 6, 2017
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/136398
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés