Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. DNA binding specificity of different STAT proteins. Comparison of in vitro specificity with natural target sites
 
research article

DNA binding specificity of different STAT proteins. Comparison of in vitro specificity with natural target sites

Ehret, G. B.
•
Reichenbach, P.
•
Schindler, U.
Show more
2001
Journal of Biological Chemistry

STAT transcription factors are expressed in many cell types and bind to similar sequences. However, different STAT gene knock-outs show very distinct phenotypes. To determine whether differences between the binding specificities of STAT proteins account for these effects, we compared the sequences bound by STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. One sequence set was selected from random oligonucleotides by recombinant STAT1, STAT5A, or STAT6. For another set including many weak binding sites, we quantified the relative affinities to STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. We compared the results to the binding sites in natural STAT target genes identified by others. The experiments confirmed the similar specificity of different STAT proteins. Detailed analysis indicated that STAT5A specificity is more similar to that of STAT6 than that of STAT1, as expected from the evolutionary relationships. The preference of STAT6 for sites in which the half-palindromes (TTC) are separated by four nucleotides (N(4)) was confirmed, but analysis of weak binding sites showed that STAT6 binds fairly well to N(3) sites. As previously reported, STAT1 and STAT5 prefer N(3) sites; however, STAT5A, but not STAT1, weakly binds N(4) sites. None of the STATs bound to half-palindromes. There were no specificity differences between STAT5A and STAT5B.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1074/jbc.M001748200
Author(s)
Ehret, G. B.
Reichenbach, P.
Schindler, U.
Horvath, C. M.
Fritz, S.
Nabholz, M.
Bucher, P.  
Date Issued

2001

Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Volume

276

Issue

9

Start page

6675

End page

88

Note

Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC) 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. markus.nabholz@isrec.unil.ch

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

OTHER

EPFL units
GR-BUCHER  
Available on Infoscience
December 17, 2007
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/15709
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés