Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Conferences, Workshops, Symposiums, and Seminars
  4. Comparison of different in situ product-removal methods to enhance the production of the aroma compound 2-phenylethanol
 
conference paper

Comparison of different in situ product-removal methods to enhance the production of the aroma compound 2-phenylethanol

Stark, Daniel  
•
Munch, Thomas
•
Bernhard, Sonnleitner
Show more
2000
Book of Abstracts, 219th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, March 26-30, 2000

There is an increasing interest by the flavor industry for producing natural aroma compds. through biocatalysts. L-Phenylalanine is transformed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae into 2-phenylethanol, which has a rose-like odor. Unfortunately this product inhibits growth even at low concns. and therefore its max. concn. is 3.9 g/l. This problem of the inhibitory effect of the product on the cell can be tackled by different in-situ product removal (ISPR) techniques. The hydrophobicity of 2-phenylethanol differs from those of the precursor and culture medium. Therefore, extn. into a second org. phase seems to be an appropriate ISPR-technique. This method keeps the 2-phenylethanol concn. in the aq. reaction phase below an inhibitory level in order to sustain a high productivity of the system. In this work, three different integrated processes involving the solvent extn. of 2-phenylethanol from the fermn. broth are evaluated. The first case is a two-phase fermn., where a water-immiscible fatty acid, which shows neither a mol. nor a phase toxicity, is added directly into the reactor vessel. The inhibitory 2-phenylethanol preferably partitions in the org. phase and therefore its concn. in the aq. phase is reduced. In this way, the final concn. of 2-phenylethanol is increased up to 9.1 g/l. The second approach uses an ester as second water-immiscible phase that has more a favorable partitioning for 2-phenylethanol but reveals a phase toxicity towards the cells. Thus the yeast is immobilized in chitosan-alginate beads to protect them from the toxic extractant. The third integrated bioprocess, completely novel, uses alginate capsules that contain the extractant in the core. The capsules are added to the fermn. broth and ext. the inhibitory 2-phenylethanol while it is produced. In this way the encapsulated solvent is not in direct contact with the cells and can prevent the cells from the phase toxicity. Conclusion: Solvents that do not show a phase toxicity can be added directly into the reactor vessel, whereas solvents having a phase toxicity can be encapsulated in alginate capsules which prevent the direct contact of the cells with the solvent. [on SciFinder (R)]

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
conference paper
Web of Science ID

WOS:000087246100014

Author(s)
Stark, Daniel  
Munch, Thomas
Bernhard, Sonnleitner
Marison, Ian William  
von Stockar, Urs  
Date Issued

2000

Published in
Book of Abstracts, 219th ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, March 26-30, 2000
Start page

AGFD

End page

013

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LGCB  
Available on Infoscience
February 27, 2006
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/226046
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés