Deep learning for the rapid automatic quantification and characterization of rotator cuff muscle degeneration from shoulder CT datasets
Objectives This study aimed at developing a convolutional neural network (CNN) able to automatically quantify and characterize the level of degeneration of rotator cuff (RC) muscles from shoulder CT images including muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. Methods One hundred three shoulder CT scans from 95 patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty were retrospectively retrieved. Three independent radiologists manually segmented the premorbid boundaries of all four RC muscles on standardized sagittal-oblique CT sections. This premorbid muscle segmentation was further automatically predicted using a CNN. Automatically predicted premorbid segmentations were then used to quantify the ratio of muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, secondary bone formation, and overall muscle degeneration. These muscle parameters were compared with measures obtained manually by human raters. Results Average Dice similarity coefficients for muscle segmentations obtained automatically with the CNN (88% +/- 9%) and manually by human raters (89% +/- 6%) were comparable. No significant differences were observed for the subscapularis, supraspinatus, and teres minor muscles (p > 0.120), whereas Dice coefficients of the automatic segmentation were significantly higher for the infraspinatus (p < 0.012). The automatic approach was able to provide good-very good estimates of muscle atrophy (R-2 = 0.87), fatty infiltration (R-2 = 0.91), and overall muscle degeneration (R-2 = 0.91). However, CNN-derived segmentations showed a higher variability in quantifying secondary bone formation (R-2 = 0.61) than human raters (R-2 = 0.87). Conclusions Deep learning provides a rapid and reliable automatic quantification of RC muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, and overall muscle degeneration directly from preoperative shoulder CT scans of osteoarthritic patients, with an accuracy comparable with that of human raters.
s00330-020-07070-7.pdf
Publisher's version
openaccess
2.41 MB
Adobe PDF
39361c2b2f751c368619ae43a9a26184