Salarian, A.Horak, F.Zampieri, C.Carlson-Kuhta, P.Nutt, J.Aminian, K.2010-01-272010-01-272010-01-27201010.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047606https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/46244WOS:000281782000010Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used clinical paradigm to evaluate balance and mobility. Although TUG includes several complex subcomponents, namely: sit-to-stand, gait, 180 degrees turn, and turn-to-sit; the only outcome is the total time to perform the task. We have proposed an instrumented TUG, called iTUG, using portable inertial sensors to improve TUG in several ways: automatic detection and separation of subcomponents, detailed analysis of each one of them and a higher sensitivity than TUG. Twelve subjects in early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) and 12 age matched control subjects were enrolled. Stopwatch measurements did not show a significant difference between the two groups. The iTUG, however, showed a significant difference in cadence between early PD and control subjects (111.1 +/- 6.2 versus 120.4 +/- 7.6 step/min, p < 0.006) as well as in angular velocity of arm-swing (123 +/- 32.0 versus 174.0 +/- 50.4 degrees/s, p < 0.005), turning duration (2.18 +/- 0.43 versus 1.79 +/- 0.27 s, p < 0.023), and time to perform turn-to-sits (2.96 +/- 0.68 versus 2.40 +/- 0.33 s, p < 0.023). By repeating the tests for a second time, the test-retest reliability of iTUG was also evaluated. Among the subcomponents of iTUG, gait, turning, and turn-to-sit were the most reliable and sit-to-stand was the least reliable.Balancegaitmobilityobjective assessmentwearable sensorsParkinsons-DiseaseGo TestAmbulatory SystemOlder-PeopleElderly PersonsGet-UpGaitBalanceStandFallstext::journal::journal article::research article