Goel, NamanFilos Ratsikas, ArisFaltings, Boi2023-02-092023-02-092023-02-092022-12-0710.24963/ijcai.2020/18https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/194720We derive conditions under which a peer-consistency mechanism can be used to elicit truthful data from non-trusted rational agents when an aggregate statistic of the collected data affects the amount of their incentives to lie. Furthermore, we discuss the relative saving that can be achieved by the mechanism, compared to the rational outcome, if no such mechanism was implemented. Our work is motivated by distributed platforms, where decentralized data oracles collect information about real-world events, based on the aggregate information provided by often self-interested participants. We compare our theoretical observations with numerical simulations on two public real datasets.text::conference output::conference proceedings::conference paper