Aberg, Kristoffer C.Herzog, Michael H.2011-01-202011-01-202011-01-20201010.1371/journal.pone.0014161https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/63145WOS:000285041800001In motor learning, training a task B can disrupt improvements of performance of a previously learned task A, indicating that learning needs consolidation. An influential study suggested that this is the case also for visual perceptual learning [1]. Using the same paradigm, we failed to reproduce these results. Further experiments with bisection stimuli also showed no retrograde disruption from task B on task A. Hence, for the tasks tested here, perceptual learning does not suffer from retrograde interference.Discrimination TaskMotor MemorySleepConsolidationDeteriorationImprovementSkillDoes perceptual learning suffer from retrograde interference?text::journal::journal article::research article