Shepel, Sergey V.Smith, Brian L.2010-11-302010-11-302010-11-30200910.1002/fld.1804https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/60538WOS:000262014500002The paper describes and compares the performance of two options for numerically representing the surface tension force in combination with the level set interface-tracking method. In both models, the surface tension is represented as a body force, concentrated near the interface, but the technical implementation is different: the first model is based on a traditional level set approach in which the force is distributed in a band around the interface using a regularized delta function, whereas in the second, the force is partly distributed in a band around the interface and partly localized to the actual computational cells containing the interface. A comparative Study, involving analysis of several two-phase flows with moving interfaces, shows that in general the two surface tension models produce results of similar accuracy. However, in the particular case of merging and pinching-off of interfaces, the traditional level set model of surface tension produces an error that results in non-converging solutions for film-like interfaces (i.e. ones involving large contact areas). In contrast, the second model, based on the localized representation of the surface tension force, displays consistent first-order convergence.level setsurface tensionconvergencefilmfinite elementfinite volumeTracking MethodNumerical ApproximationMultiphase FlowsComputationsAlgorithmEquationsSchemesDomainstext::journal::journal article::research article