Cooper, DavidBruas, LucasBryan, MatthewBoureau, Victor2024-04-032024-04-032024-04-032024-02-0910.1016/j.micron.2024.103594https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/206921WOS:001183468700001We demonstrate the use of both pixelated differential phase contrast (DPC) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and off-axis electron holography (EH) for the measurement of electric fields and assess the advantages and limitations of each technique when applied to technologically relevant samples. Three different types of samples are examined, firstly a simple highly-doped Si pn junction. Then a SiGe superlattice is examined to evaluate the effects of the mean inner potential on the measured signal. Finally, an InGaN/GaN microwire light-emitting diode (LED) device is examined which has a polarization field, variations of mean inner potential and a wurtzite crystal lattice. We discuss aspects such as spatial resolution and sensitivity, and the concept of pseudo-field is defined. However, the most important point is the need to limit the influence of diffraction contrast to obtain accurate measurements. In this respect, the use of a plane electron wave for EH is clearly beneficial when compared to the use of a convergent beam for pixelated DPC STEM.TechnologyElectron Holography4D StemDifferential Phase ContrastSemiconductorsElectric Fieldtext::journal::journal article::research article