Limpens, J.Granath, G.Aerts, R.Heijmans, M. M. P. D.Sheppard, L. J.Bragazza, L.Williams, B. L.Rydin, H.Bubier, J.Moore, T.Rochefort, L.Mitchell, E. A. D.Buttler, A.van den Berg, L. J. L.Gunnarsson, U.Francez, A.-J.Gerdol, R.Thormann, M.Grosvernier, P.Wiedermann, M. M.Nilsson, M. B.Hoosbeek, M. R.Bayley, S.Nordbakken, J.-F.Paulissen, M. P. C. P.Hotes, S.Breeuwer, A.Ilomets, M.Tomassen, H. B. M.Leith, I.Xu, B.2012-07-132012-07-132012-07-13201210.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04157.xhttps://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/83830WOS:000305472100014Peat bogs have accumulated more atmospheric carbon (C) than any other terrestrial ecosystem today. Most of this C is associated with peat moss (Sphagnum) litter. Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can decrease Sphagnum production, compromising the C sequestration capacity of peat bogs. The mechanisms underlying the reduced production are uncertain, necessitating multifactorial experiments.carbon (C)climateexperimentsmeta-analysismires and peatlandsnitrogen depositionproductivitySphagnumNitrogen DepositionSphagnum MossesMetaanalysisPeatlandsCarbonScaleResponsesEcologyCycleGlasshouse vs field experiments: do they yield ecologically similar results for assessing N impacts on peat mosses?text::journal::journal article::research article