A field study investigation on the influence of light level on subjective thermal perception in different seasons

This paper evaluates the influence of light levels (i.e., illuminance) on subjective thermal perception of people, distinguishing between thermal sensation and thermal evaluation. The goal is to investigate whether reported effects found by other studies in controlled environments can be observed in real-life contexts and to understand if results are influenced by the season. By means of a post-occupancy evaluation conducted in four buildings in Switzerland, instantaneous air temperature and illuminance measurements were collected together with occupant’s thermal perception votes during daytime in both summer and winter. Findings show that illuminance has a significant effect on the thermal perception of people, but only in terms of thermal evaluation and not of thermal sensation. In particular, results indicate that, at high temperature (above 25 °C), a less satisfying thermal evaluation is reported by people exposed to dim light (lower than 300 lux) compared to people exposed to brighter environments. We assume that this finding can be explained by thermal expectations induced by light intensity. The evaluation of data across summer and winter indicates that results are independent of the season (no interactions between illuminance, temperature and time of the year) and that the illuminance effect is accentuated depending on the season, which tends to highlight the psychological nature of thermal evaluation.

Brotas, Luisa
Roaf, Susan
Nicol, Fergus
Humphreys, Michael
Published in:
Proceedings of 10th Windsor Conference: Rethinking Comfort
Presented at:
10th Windsor Conference: Rethinking Comfort, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, April 12-15, 2018
Apr 15 2018
NCEUB 2018
Editors of Proceedings: Dr Luisa Brotas, Prof Susan Roaf, Prof Fergus Nicol, Prof Rev Michael Humphreys

Note: The status of this file is: Anyone
The status of this file is: EPFL only

 Record created 2018-05-09, last modified 2020-10-25

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)