000227525 001__ 227525
000227525 005__ 20190416220336.0
000227525 020__ $$a978-1-5386-4024-1
000227525 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1109/QoMEX.2017.7965636
000227525 037__ $$aCONF
000227525 245__ $$aImpact of interactivity on the assessment of quality of experience for light field content
000227525 269__ $$a2017
000227525 260__ $$c2017
000227525 336__ $$aConference Papers
000227525 520__ $$aThe recent advances in light field imaging are changing the way in which visual content is captured, processed and consumed. Storage and delivery systems for light field images rely on efficient compression algorithms. Such algorithms must additionally take into account the feature-rich rendering for light field content. Therefore, a proper evaluation of visual quality is essential to design and improve coding solutions for light field content. Consequently, the design of subjective tests should also reflect the light field rendering process. This paper aims at presenting and comparing two methodologies to assess the quality of experience in light field imaging. The first methodology uses an interactive approach, allowing subjects to engage with the light field content when assessing it. The second, on the other hand, is completely passive to ensure all the subjects will have the same experience. Advantages and drawbacks of each approach are compared by relying on statistical analysis of results and conclusions are drawn. The obtained results provide useful insights for future design of evaluation techniques for light field content.
000227525 6531_ $$alight field
000227525 6531_ $$asubjective evaluation
000227525 6531_ $$ainteractivity
000227525 6531_ $$aimage coding
000227525 6531_ $$aimage compression
000227525 700__ $$0249547$$g249303$$aViola, Irene
000227525 700__ $$0244457$$g206402$$aRerabek, Martin
000227525 700__ $$aEbrahimi, Touradj$$g105043$$0240223
000227525 7112_ $$dMay 31 - June 02, 2017$$cErfurt, Germany$$a9th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
000227525 8564_ $$uhttps://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/227525/files/QoMEX_2017_paper_19.pdf$$zPublisher's version$$s2318976$$yPublisher's version
000227525 909C0 $$0252077$$pMMSPL
000227525 909CO $$pSTI$$ooai:infoscience.tind.io:227525$$qGLOBAL_SET$$pconf
000227525 917Z8 $$x249303
000227525 917Z8 $$x249303
000227525 917Z8 $$x249303
000227525 917Z8 $$x249303
000227525 937__ $$aEPFL-CONF-227525
000227525 973__ $$rREVIEWED$$sPUBLISHED$$aEPFL
000227525 980__ $$aCONF