000223589 001__ 223589
000223589 005__ 20190407080404.0
000223589 020__ $$a978-3-319-45501-3
000223589 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/978-3-319-45501-3_4
000223589 02470 $$a000389799800004$$2ISI
000223589 037__ $$aCONF
000223589 245__ $$aCritiquing as an alternative to generating concept maps to support knowledge integration processes
000223589 269__ $$a2016
000223589 260__ $$bSpringer$$c2016
000223589 336__ $$aConference Papers
000223589 490__ $$aCommunications in Computer and Information Science$$v635
000223589 520__ $$aAs constructing concept maps from scratch can be time consuming, this study explores critiquing given concept maps with deliberate errors as an alternative. A form of concept map that distinguishes between different levels, called Knowledge Integration Map (KIM), was used as an assessment and embedded learning tool. The technology-enhanced biology unit was implemented in four high school science classes (n=93). Student dyads in each class were randomly assigned to the KIM generation (n=41) or critique (n=52) task. Dyads in the generation group created their own connections from a given list of concepts, while dyads in the critique group received a concept map that included commonly found errors. KIMs in both groups consisted of the same concepts. Findings indicate that generating or critiquing KIMs can facilitate the construc-tion of cross-level connections. Furthermore, results suggest that critiquing con-cept maps might be a more time-efficient alternative to generating concept maps from scratch.
000223589 6531_ $$aConcept map
000223589 6531_ $$aAssessment
000223589 6531_ $$aScience education
000223589 6531_ $$aCritique
000223589 6531_ $$aCollaboration
000223589 6531_ $$aKnowledge integration
000223589 6531_ $$aLearning
000223589 700__ $$0247952$$g241314$$aSchwendimann, Beat Adrian
000223589 7112_ $$a7th International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC)$$cTalinn, Estonia$$dSep 05-09, 2016
000223589 720_1 $$aCañas, Alberto J.$$eed.
000223589 720_1 $$aReiska, Priit$$eed.
000223589 720_1 $$aNovak, Joseph D.$$eed.
000223589 773__ $$tInnovating with Concept Mapping$$q40-53
000223589 8564_ $$uhttps://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/223589/files/CMC2016%20generate%20vs%20critique%20study%20%28final%20Springer%29.doc$$zn/a$$s1591808$$yn/a
000223589 909CO $$qGLOBAL_SET$$pIC$$pconf$$ooai:infoscience.tind.io:223589
000223589 909C0 $$xU12753$$0252475$$pCHILI
000223589 917Z8 $$x241314
000223589 937__ $$aEPFL-CHAPTER-223589
000223589 973__ $$sPUBLISHED$$aEPFL
000223589 980__ $$aCONF