Decentralized list scheduling

Classical list scheduling is a very popular and efficient technique for scheduling jobs for parallel and distributed platforms. It is inherently centralized. However, with the increasing number of processors, the cost for managing a single centralized list becomes too prohibitive. A suitable approach to reduce the contention is to distribute the list among the computational units: each processor only has a local view of the work to execute. Thus, the scheduler is no longer greedy and standard performance guarantees are lost. The objective of this work is to study the extra cost that must be paid when the list is distributed among the computational units. We first present a general methodology for computing the expected makespan based on the analysis of an adequate potential function which represents the load imbalance between the local lists. We obtain an equation giving the evolution of the potential by computing its expected decrease in one step of the schedule. Our main theorem shows how to solve such equations to bound the makespan. Then, we apply this method to several scheduling problems, namely, for unit independent tasks, for weighted independent tasks and for tasks with precedence constraints. More precisely, we prove that the time for scheduling a global workload $W$ composed of independent unit tasks on $m$ processors is equal to $W/m$ plus an additional term proportional to $\log_2 W$. We provide a lower bound which shows that this is optimal up to a constant. This result is extended to the case of weighted independent tasks. In the last setting, precedence task graphs, our analysis leads to an improvement on the bound of \cite{ABP}. We end with some experiments using a simulator. The distribution of the makespan is shown to fit existing probability laws. Moreover, the simulations give a better insight into the additive term whose value is shown to be around $3 \log_2 W$ confirming the precision of our analysis.

Published in:
Annals of Operations Research
Dordrecht, Springer

 Record created 2013-02-05, last modified 2018-03-17

Download fulltext

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)