000169598 001__ 169598
000169598 005__ 20190316235220.0
000169598 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1117/12.805966
000169598 022__ $$a1996-756X
000169598 037__ $$aCONF
000169598 245__ $$aMeasurement of printer MTFs
000169598 260__ $$bSPIE$$c2009
000169598 269__ $$a2009
000169598 336__ $$aConference Papers
000169598 520__ $$aIn this paper we compare three existing methods to measure the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of a printing system. Although all three methods use very distinct approaches, the MTF values computed for two of these methods strongly agree, lending credibility to these methods. Additionally, we propose an improvement to one of these two methods, initially proposed by Jang & Allebach. We demonstrate that our proposed modification improves the measurement precision and simplicity of implementation. Finally we discuss the pros and cons of the methods depending on the intended usage of the MTF.
000169598 6531_ $$aMTF
000169598 6531_ $$aprinter
000169598 6531_ $$ameasure
000169598 6531_ $$aimage quality
000169598 700__ $$0242496$$g185235$$aLindner, Albrecht
000169598 700__ $$aBonnier, Nicolas
000169598 700__ $$aLeynadier, Christophe
000169598 700__ $$aSchmitt, Francis
000169598 7112_ $$dJanuary 19-23, 2009$$cSan Jose, CA, USA$$aImage Quality and System Performance VI
000169598 773__ $$j7242$$tProceedings of SPIE$$q72420N-72420N-12
000169598 8564_ $$uhttps://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/169598/files/EI2009_Lindner.pdf$$zPublisher's version$$s416105$$yPublisher's version
000169598 909C0 $$xU10423$$0252435$$pISC
000169598 909CO $$qGLOBAL_SET$$pconf$$ooai:infoscience.tind.io:169598
000169598 917Z8 $$x185235
000169598 917Z8 $$x185235
000169598 917Z8 $$x148230
000169598 937__ $$aEPFL-CONF-169598
000169598 973__ $$rREVIEWED$$sPUBLISHED$$aEPFL
000169598 980__ $$aCONF