TY - CPAPER
DO - 10.1007/s00446-007-0043-z
AB - The power of an object type T can be measured as the maximum number n of processes that can solve consensus using only objects of T and registers. This number, denoted cons(T), is called the consensus power of T. This paper addresses the question of the weakest failure detector to solve consensus among a number k > n of processes that communicate using shared objects of a type T with consensus power n. In other words, we seek for a failure detector that is sufficient and necessary to "boost" the consensus power of a type T from n to k. It was shown in Neiger (Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on principles of distributed computing (PODC), pp. 100-109, 1995) that a certain failure detector, denoted Omega (n) , is sufficient to boost the power of a type T from n to k, and it was conjectured that Omega (n) was also necessary. In this paper, we prove this conjecture for one-shot deterministic types. We first show that, for any one-shot deterministic type T with cons(T) <= n, Omega (n) is necessary to boost the power of T from n to n + 1. Then we go a step further and show that Omega(n) is also the weakest to boost the power of (n + 1)-ported one-shot deterministic types from n to any k > n. Our result generalizes, in a precise sense, the result of the weakest failure detector to solve consensus in asynchronous message-passing systems (Chandra et al. in J ACM 43(4):685-722, 1996). As a corollary, we show that Omega (t) is the weakest failure detector to boost the resilience level of a distributed shared memory system, i.e., to solve consensus among n > t processes using (t - 1)-resilient objects of consensus power t.
T1 - Failure detectors as type boosters
DA - 2008
AU - Guerraoui, Rachid
AU - Kouznetsov, Petr
JF - Distributed Computing
SP - 343-358
VL - 20
EP - 343-358
PB - Springer-Verlag
N1 - National Licences
ID - 161205
KW - Wait-Free Hierarchies
KW - Distributed Consensus
KW - Robust
SN - 0178-2770
UR - http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/161205/files/446_2007_Article_43.pdf
ER -