000138910 001__ 138910
000138910 005__ 20190118054304.0
000138910 037__ $$aCONF
000138910 245__ $$aPredicting Acute Hypotensive Episodes
000138910 336__ $$aConference Papers
000138910 520__ $$aThe goal of the challenge 2009 is to predict which patients will experience acute hypotensive episode (AHE) within a forecast window. AHE may result in dangerous complications and even death. Predicting the onset of AHE would be of clear benefit to a patient's outcome and reduce its stay in intensive care unit (ICU). The challenge is composed of two events, the first event focuses on distinguishing between two groups of ICU patients who are receiving pressor medication: patients who experience an AHE (H1), and patients who do not (C1). These two groups represent extremes of AHE-associated risk. The second event aims to address the broad question of predicting AHE within the forecast window in a population in which about a third of the patients experience AHE (H2 and C2). In all cases, classification was performed using a support vector machine (SVM) with a linear function kernel, trained with features selected on the training sets. To classify records from training set A belonging to the subgroup H1, the features leading to the lowest error rate were kept. The two features used were the median and the median absolute deviation of the mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) over the two hours preceding the forecast window. Using a leave-one-out technique, 29 out of 30 training records were correctly classified using those two robust statistics. Additional features from the heart rate, the respiration, the systolic or diastolic ABP did not increase the classification rate. To classify records from training set B belonging to the subgroup H2, an additional feature has been introduced. Using the slope of the MABP over the last 20 minutes increased the classification of the training set from 20 to 22 correct classifications out of 30. When applied to the test sets, we obtained a correct classification of 10 out of 10 for test set A and 29 out of 40 for test set B. Robust statistics proved to perform better in both events than standard ones. Limited performance in event 2 may be explained by the large variability of the data.
000138910 6531_ $$aAcute Hypotensive Episode
000138910 6531_ $$aPrediction
000138910 6531_ $$aArterial Blood Pressure
000138910 700__ $$aJousset, Florian
000138910 700__ $$aLemay, Mathieu
000138910 700__ $$0240458$$aVesin, Jean-Marc$$g106643
000138910 7112_ $$aComputers in Cardiology$$cPark City$$dSeptember 13-16, 2009
000138910 909C0 $$0252397$$pLTS
000138910 909CO $$ooai:infoscience.tind.io:138910$$pconf
000138910 937__ $$aLTS-CONF-2009-067
000138910 973__ $$aEPFL$$rREVIEWED$$sACCEPTED
000138910 980__ $$aCONF