Reproducible Research Score versus Citations

Addition to Figure 2. Scores from reproducible research study versus number of citations, as measured on March 6, 2008. The multiplicity of a data point is indicated by the size of the marker. The right part of the plots shows that highly cited papers typically have code and data available online.
1a. Algorithm details versus Google Scholar citations 1b. Algorithm details versus Web of Science citations
2a. Parameter values versus Google Scholar citations 2b. Parameter values versus Web of Science citations
3a. Block diagram versus Google Scholar citations 3b. Block diagram versus Web of Science citations
4a. Pseudo-code versus Google Scholar citations 4b. Pseudo-code versus Web of Science citations
5a. Either block diagram or pseudo-code versus Google Scholar citations 5b. Either block diagram or pseudo-code versus Web of Science citations
6a. Proof availability versus Google Scholar citations 6b. Proof availability versus Web of Science citations
7a. Comparison with other algorithms versus Google Scholar citations 7b. Comparison with other algorithms versus Web of Science citations
8a. Implementation details versus Google Scholar citations 8b. Implementation details versus Web of Science citations
9a. Code online versus Google Scholar citations 9b. Code online versus Web of Science citations
10a. Explanation of data versus Google Scholar citations 10b. Explanation of data versus Web of Science citations
11a. Size of dataset score versus Google Scholar citations 11b. Size of dataset score versus Web of Science citations
12a. Data online versus Google Scholar citations 12b. Data online versus Web of Science citations