Store misses cause significant delays in shared-memory multiprocessors because of limited store buffering and ordering constraints required for proper synchronization. Today, programmers must choose from a spectrum of memory consistency models that reduce store stalls at the cost of increased programming complexity. Prior research suggests that the performance gap among consistency models can be closed through speculation--enforcing order only when dynamically necessary. Unfortunately, past designs either provide insufficient buffering, replace all stores with read-modify-write operations, and/or recover from ordering violations via impractical fine-grained rollback mechanisms. We propose two mechanisms that, together, enable store-wait-free implementations of any memory consistency model. To eliminate buffer-capacity-related stalls, we propose the scalable store buffer, which places private/speculative values directly into the L1 cache, thereby eliminating the non-scalable associative search of conventional store buffers. To eliminate ordering-related stalls, we propose atomic sequence ordering, which enforces ordering constraints over coarse-grain access sequences while relaxing order among individual accesses. Using cycle-accurate full-system simulation of scientific and commercial applications, we demonstrate that these mechanisms allow the simplified programming of strict ordering while outperforming conventional implementations on average by 32% (sequential consistency), 22% (SPARC total store order) and 9% (SPARC relaxed memory order).