Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Sawdust addition reduces the productivity of nitrogen-enriched mountain grasslands
 
research article

Sawdust addition reduces the productivity of nitrogen-enriched mountain grasslands

Spiegelberger, Thomas  
•
Matthies, Diethard
•
Müller-Schärer, Heinz
Show more
2009
Restoration Ecology

Anthropogenic nutrient enrichment of mountain grasslands has boosted grasses and fast-growing unpalatable plants at the expense of slow-growing species, resulting in a significant loss in biodiversity. A potential tool to reduce nutrient availability and aboveground productivity without destroying the perennial vegetation is carbon (C) addition. However, little is known about its suitability under severe climatic conditions. Here, we report the results of a 3-year field study assessing the effects of sawdust addition on soil nutrients, aboveground productivity, and vegetational composition of 10 grazed and ungrazed mountain grasslands. Of particular interest was the effect of C addition on grasses and on the tall unpalatable weed Veratrum album. After 3 years, soil pH, ammonium, and plant-available phosphorus were not altered by sawdust application, and nitrate concentrations were marginally higher in treatment plots. However, the biomass of grasses and forbs (without V. album) was 20–25% lower in sawdust-amended plots, whereas the biomass of V. album was marginally higher. Sawdust addition reduced the cover of grasses but did not affect evenness, vegetation diversity, or plant species richness, although species richness generally increased with decreasing biomass at our sites. Our results suggest that sawdust addition is a potent tool to reduce within a relatively short time the aboveground productivity and grass cover in both grazed and ungrazed mountain grasslands as long as they are not dominated by tall unpalatable weeds. The technique has the advantage that it preserves the topsoil and the perennial soil seed bank.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00424.x
Author(s)
Spiegelberger, Thomas  
Matthies, Diethard
Müller-Schärer, Heinz
Schaffner, Urs
Date Issued

2009

Published in
Restoration Ecology
Volume

17

Start page

865

End page

872

Subjects

carbon addition

•

competitive interactions

•

European Alps

•

multisite field experiment

•

seminatural grasslands

•

soil nutrient availability

•

restoration

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

OTHER

EPFL units
ECOS  
Available on Infoscience
February 3, 2009
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/34733
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés