Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Emerging risks from ballast water treatment: The run-up to the International Ballast Water Management Convention
 
review article

Emerging risks from ballast water treatment: The run-up to the International Ballast Water Management Convention

Werschkun, Barbara
•
Banerji, Sangeeta
•
Basurko, Oihane C.
Show more
2014
Chemosphere

Uptake and discharge of ballast water by ocean-going ships contribute to the worldwide spread of aquatic invasive species, with negative impacts on the environment, economies, and public health. The International Ballast Water Management Convention aims at a global answer. The agreed standards for ballast water discharge will require ballast water treatment. Systems based on various physical and/or chemical methods were developed for on-board installation and approved by the International Maritime Organization. Most common are combinations of high-performance filters with oxidizing chemicals or UV radiation. A well-known problem of oxidative water treatment is the formation of disinfection by-products, many of which show genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, or other long-term toxicity. In natural biota, genetic damages can affect reproductive success and ultimately impact biodiversity. The future exposure towards chemicals from ballast water treatment can only be estimated, based on land-based testing of treatment systems, mathematical models, and exposure scenarios. Systematic studies on the chemistry of oxidants in seawater are lacking, as are data about the background levels of disinfection by-products in the oceans and strategies for monitoring future developments. The international approval procedure of ballast water treatment systems compares the estimated exposure levels of individual substances with their experimental toxicity. While well established in many substance regulations, this approach is also criticised for its simplification, which may disregard critical aspects such as multiple exposures and long-term sub-lethal effects. Moreover, a truly holistic sustainability assessment would need to take into account factors beyond chemical hazards, e:g. energy consumption, air pollution or waste generation. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.135
Web of Science ID

WOS:000340688300034

Author(s)
Werschkun, Barbara
Banerji, Sangeeta
Basurko, Oihane C.
David, Matej
Fuhr, Frank
Gollasch, Stephan
Grummt, Tamara
Haarich, Michael
Jha, Awadhesh N.
Kacan, Stefan
Show more
Date Issued

2014

Publisher

Elsevier

Published in
Chemosphere
Volume

112

Start page

256

End page

266

Subjects

Disinfection by-products

•

Environmental health

•

Genotoxicity

•

Marine pollution

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LTQE  
Available on Infoscience
October 23, 2014
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/107635
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés