Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Test-retest variability of brain morphometry analysis: an investigation of sequence and coil effects
 
research article

Test-retest variability of brain morphometry analysis: an investigation of sequence and coil effects

Yan, Shuang
•
Qian, Tianyi
•
Marechal, Benedicte  
Show more
January 1, 2020
Annals Of Translational Medicine

Background: Precise and reliable brain morphometry analysis is critical for clinical and research purposes. The magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE), multi-echo MPRAGE (MEMPRAGE) and magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) sequences have all been used to acquire brain structural images, but it is unclear which of these sequences is the most suitable for brain morphometry and whether the number of coil channels (20 or 32) affects scan precision. This study aimed to assess the impact of T1-weighted image acquisition variables (sequence and head coil) on the repeatability of resultant automated volumetric measurements.

Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent back-to-back scanning protocols with three sequences and two different coils (i.e., six scanning conditions in total) presented in a randomized order in a single session. MorphoBox prototype and FreeSurfer were used for brain segmentation. Brain structures were divided into cortical and subcortical regions for more precise analysis. The acquired volume and thickness values were used to calculate test-retest variability (TRV) values. TRV values from the six different combinations were compared for total brain structures, total cortical structures, total subcortical structures, and every single structure.

Results: The median TRV value for all brain regions was 1.23% with MorphoBox and 3.14% with FreeSurfer. When using FreeSurfer results to compare the six combinations, for total brain structures volume and total cortical structures volume and thickness, the MEMPRAGE-32 channel combination showed significantly lower TRV values than the others (P<0.01). Similar results were observed with MorphoBox. For total subcortical structures, the MP2RAGE-32 channel combination showed the lowest TRV values with both MorphoBox (lower about 0.01% to 0.17%) and FreeSurfer analyses (lower about 0.02% to 0.37%).

Conclusions: TRV values were generally low, indicating generally high reliability for every region. The MEMPRAGE sequence was the most reliable of the three sequences for total brain structures and cortical structures. However, MP2RAGE was the most reliable for subcortical structures. The 32-channel coil showed better repeatability results than the 20-channel coil.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.21037/atm.2019.11.149
Web of Science ID

WOS:000507230700012

Author(s)
Yan, Shuang
Qian, Tianyi
Marechal, Benedicte  
Kober, Tobias  
Zhang, Xianchang
Zhu, Jinxia
Lei, Jing
Li, Mingli
Jin, Zhengyu
Date Issued

2020-01-01

Publisher

AME PUBL CO

Published in
Annals Of Translational Medicine
Volume

8

Issue

1

Start page

12

Subjects

Oncology

•

Medicine, Research & Experimental

•

Research & Experimental Medicine

•

test-retest variability (trv)

•

magnetic resonance imaging (mri) repeatability

•

brain morphometry

•

post-processing robustness

•

volume-based morphometry

•

surface-based analysis

•

3 t mri

•

head coil

•

reliability

•

mp2rage

•

reproducibility

•

segmentation

•

32-channel

•

phantom

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
LTS5  
Available on Infoscience
March 3, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/166852
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés