The success of machine learning (ML) has been intimately linked with the availability of large amounts of data, typically collected from heterogeneous sources and processed on vast networks of computing devices (also called workers). Beyond accuracy, the use of ML in critical domains such as healthcare and autonomous driving calls for robustness against data poisoning and faulty workers. The problem of Byzantine ML formalizes these robustness issues by considering a distributed ML environment in which workers (storing a portion of the global dataset) can deviate arbitrarily from the prescribed algorithm. Although the problem has attracted a lot of attention from a theoretical point of view, its practical importance for addressing realistic faults (where the behavior of any worker is locally constrained) remains unclear. It has been argued that the seemingly weaker threat model where only workers' local datasets get poisoned is more reasonable. We highlight here some important results on the efficacy of Byzantine robustness for tackling data poisoning. In particular, we discuss cases where, while tolerating a wider range of faulty behaviors, Byzantine ML yields solutions that are optimal even under the weaker threat model of data poisoning.