When do Minimax-fair Learning and Empirical Risk Minimization Coincide?
Minimax-fair machine learning minimizes the error for the worst-off group. However, empirical evidence suggests that when sophisticated models are trained with standard empirical risk minimization (ERM), they often have the same performance on the worst-off group as a minimaxtrained model. Our work makes this counterintuitive observation concrete. We prove that if the hypothesis class is sufficiently expressive and the group information is recoverable from the features, ERM and minimax-fairness learning formulations indeed have the same performance on the worst-off group. We provide additional empirical evidence of how this observation holds on a wide range of datasets and hypothesis classes. Since ERM is fundamentally easier than minimax optimization, our findings have implications on the practice of fair machine learning.
6404_when_do_minimax_fair_learning_.pdf
postprint
openaccess
copyright
521.81 KB
Adobe PDF
c0a5e7a0380f9b209937f60526feb936