Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. A Murine Model of Robotic Training to Evaluate Skeletal Muscle Recovery after Injury
 
research article

A Murine Model of Robotic Training to Evaluate Skeletal Muscle Recovery after Injury

Lai, Stefano
•
Panarese, Alessandro
•
Lawrence, Ross
Show more
2017
Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise

LAI, S., A. PANARESE, R. LAWRENCE, M. L. BONINGER, S. MICERA, and F. AMBROSIO. A Murine Model of Robotic Training to Evaluate Skeletal Muscle Recovery after Injury. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 840-847, 2017. Purpose: In vivo studies have suggested that motor exercise can improve muscle regeneration after injury. Nevertheless, preclinical investigations still lack reliable tools to monitor motor performance over time and to deliver optimal training protocols to maximize force recovery. Here, we evaluated the utility of a murine robotic platform (i) to detect early impairment and longitudinal recovery after acute skeletal muscle injury and (ii) to administer varying intensity training protocols to enhance forelimb motor performance. Methods: A custom-designed robotic platform was used to train mice to perform a forelimb retraction task. After an acute injury to bilateral biceps brachii muscles, animals performed a daily training protocol in the platform at high (HL) or low (LL) loading levels over the course of 3 wk. Control animals were not trained (NT). Motor performance was assessed by quantifying force, time, submovement count, and number of movement attempts to accomplish the task. Myofiber number and cross-sectional area at the injury site were quantified histologically. Results: Two days after injury, significant differences in the time, submovement count, number of movement attempts, and exerted force were observed in all mice, as compared with baseline values. Interestingly, the recovery time of muscle force production differed significantly between intervention groups, with HL group showing a significantly accelerated recovery. Three weeks after injury, all groups showed motor performance comparable with baseline values. Accordingly, there were no differences in the number of myofibers or average cross-sectional area among groups after 3 wk. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the utility of our custom-designed robotic device for the quantitative assessment of skeletal muscle function in preclinical murine studies. Moreover, we demonstrate that this device may be used to apply varying levels of resistance longitudinally as a means manipulate physiological muscle responses.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
research article
DOI
10.1249/Mss.0000000000001160
Web of Science ID

WOS:000397910300026

Author(s)
Lai, Stefano
Panarese, Alessandro
Lawrence, Ross
Boninger, Michael L.
Micera, Silvestro  
Ambrosio, Fabrisia
Date Issued

2017

Publisher

American College of Sports Medicine

Published in
Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise
Volume

49

Issue

4

Start page

840

End page

847

Subjects

SKELETAL MUSCLE INJURY

•

STRENGTH

•

ROBOTIC TRAINING

•

MOUSE

•

SKELETAL MUSCLE REGENERATION

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
TNE  
Available on Infoscience
May 1, 2017
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/136781
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés