Repository logo

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

Infoscience

  • English
  • French
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Academic and Research Output
  3. Journal articles
  4. Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit
 
review article

Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit

Grossiord, Charlotte  
•
Buckley, Thomas N.
•
Cernusak, Lucas A.
Show more
2020
New Phytologist

Recent decades have been characterized by increasing temperatures worldwide, resulting in an exponential climb in vapor pressure deficit (VPD). VPD has been identified as an increasingly important driver of plant functioning in terrestrial biomes including being a major contributor in recent drought‐induced plant mortality, independently from other drivers associated with climate change. Despite this, few studies have isolated the physiological response of plant functioning to high VPD, thus limiting our understanding and ability to predict future impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. An abundance of evidence suggests that stomatal conductance declines under high VPD and transpiration increases in most species up until a given VPD threshold, leading to a cascade of subsequent impacts including reduced photosynthesis and growth, and higher risks of carbon starvation and hydraulic failure. Incorporation of photosynthetic and hydraulic traits in ‘next‐generation’ land‐surface models has the greatest potential for improved prediction of VPD responses at the plant‐ and global‐scale, and will yield more mechanistic simulations of plant responses to a changing climate. By providing a fully integrated framework and evaluation of the impacts of high VPD on plant function, improvements in forecasting and long‐term projections of climate impacts can be made.

  • Details
  • Metrics
Type
review article
DOI
10.1111/nph.16485
Author(s)
Grossiord, Charlotte  
Buckley, Thomas N.
Cernusak, Lucas A.
Novick, Kimberly A.
Poulter, Benjamin
Siegwolf, Rolf T.W.
Sperry, John S.
McDowell, Nate G.
Date Issued

2020

Published in
New Phytologist
Volume

226

Issue

6

Start page

1550

End page

1566

Editorial or Peer reviewed

REVIEWED

Written at

EPFL

EPFL units
PERL  
Available on Infoscience
March 17, 2020
Use this identifier to reference this record
https://infoscience.epfl.ch/handle/20.500.14299/167312
Logo EPFL, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
  • Contact
  • infoscience@epfl.ch

  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on X
  • Follow us on Youtube
AccessibilityLegal noticePrivacy policyCookie settingsEnd User AgreementGet helpFeedback

Infoscience is a service managed and provided by the Library and IT Services of EPFL. © EPFL, tous droits réservés